Workplace gossip is often viewed as a benign aspect of office culture, a way for employees to bond and communicate. However, when left unchecked, it can escalate into a serious issue, fostering a toxic work environment and leading to legal complications. Australian case law, particularly through decisions by the Fair Work Commission (FWC), offers valuable insights into handling workplace gossip and underscores the legal obligations of employers to maintain a respectful work environment. Notably, cases such as Tara Davies v. Hip Hop Pty Ltd t/a Hippity Hop Child Care [2011] FWA 776 and Kym Suzanne Reedy v Global Cranes Pty Ltd [2011] FWA 3037  illustrate the consequences of mishandling gossip in the workplace.

Tara Davies v. Hip Hop Pty Ltd t/a Hippity Hop Child Care [2011] FWA 776

In the case of Tara Davies, the employee was able to bring a successful unfair dismissal case after being dismissed for gossiping in the workplace in breach of the company’s “back-biting” policy. The term “back-biting” was not defined and the policy therefore did not clearly spell out how workplace gossip would be dealt with. This resulted in the employee being able to establish that she was unfairly dismissed after her employment was terminated and to recover compensation as a consequence.

The FWC’s findings emphasise the importance of employers having thorough workplace policies to deal with workplace gossip, as well as the importance of taking proactive steps to curb gossip and ensure that workplace issues are addressed promptly and effectively.

Kym Suzanne Reedy v Global Cranes Pty Ltd [2011] FWA 3037

Similarly, in the case involving Kym Suzanne Reedy, the FWC examined the impact of workplace gossip on an individual’s professional and personal reputation. Reedy’s case brought to light how unfounded rumours and gossip can lead to claims of harassment and a hostile work environment, resulting in psychological distress for the victim. This meant that the employer was justified in dismissing Ms Reedy for spreading workplace gossip and her unfair dismissal claim was rejected. The tribunal’s decision in this matter underscores the legal imperative for employers to foster a respectful workplace culture and to intervene when gossip crosses the line into harassment or bullying.

Fair Work Commission’s stance and its implications for employers

The decisions in these cases reflect the FWC’s stance on the importance of addressing workplace gossip and the broader issue of maintaining a healthy workplace culture. Employers are expected to implement effective policies and procedures that discourage gossip and provide clear avenues for employees to report concerns. Furthermore, these cases illustrate that employers may be held legally accountable for the negative outcomes of unchecked gossip, including claims of harassment, bullying, and constructive dismissal.

Tying it all together: A call to action for employers

These legal precedents serve as a clear call for employers to take a more active role in managing workplace dynamics to prevent gossip from spiralling out of control. Establishing a zero-tolerance policy towards gossip, promoting open communication, and providing training on professional conduct are critical steps in fostering a positive work environment. Moreover, leadership must exemplify the values of respect and integrity, demonstrating that gossip and negative behaviours have no place in the workplace.

Employers must remember that their legal obligations extend beyond the physical safety of their employees to include their psychological well-being. The decisions made by the Fair Work Commission in cases such as Tara Davies and Kym Suzanne Reedy are testament to the serious view taken by Australian law on the matter of workplace gossip. By actively working to curb gossip and promote a culture of respect and professionalism, employers can not only avoid legal pitfalls but also enhance the overall productivity and morale of their workforce.

In conclusion, while gossip may seem like an innocuous part of workplace culture, its potential to harm individuals and organisations alike cannot be underestimated. Through the lens of Australian case law, it becomes evident that employers have a significant role to play in mitigating its effects. By doing so, they not only comply with their legal obligations but also contribute to creating a healthier, more inclusive, and productive workplace.


The information provided in these blog articles is general in nature and is not intended to substitute for professional advice. If you are unsure about how this information applies to your specific situation we recommend you contact HR Connect for advice.

Subscribe to our Newsletter